Let’s say the cost of a compliance program costs $12,000 annually. Is it expensive?
The replacement it makes will determine the final answer.
If automated collection eliminates hundreds of hours tedious evidence collection in a tangled technology landscape, $12,000 could be a wise investment. If a small business with seven employees could collect the same proof in a couple of hours every month, the amount differs.
It’s a smart approach to start your search for the Vanta alternative. The question of which platform offers the most advanced features isn’t the only thing to consider. Find out how many hours and time these tools can help save your company.
Automation Can be a Break-Even Economic At this
It’s not intrinsically good or evil. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a technology firm which is growing, several cloud environments, a variety of applications and frequent changes to access. The strain of manually gathering evidence over time could become extremely excessive. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence can easily justify their costs.
Think about a company with 10 employees preparing for their first SOC 2. It may have a relatively tiny infrastructure, and evidence collection could be handled with minimal automation.
Vanta pricing is based on this difference. The capabilities of a modern platform are impressive, however they only provide financial value when an organization needs them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata could quickly turn into an exercise of feature-by-feature. It is crucial to evaluate the features, services contract and quotes offered by both platforms. Both are well-established compliance platforms that focus on integrations and automation.
There’s another choice to make first, however. Does your business have an interest in an integration-driven platform for compliance? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring as well as automated evidence collection and automated evidence collection. Some companies prefer to collect evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. It also offers more lightweight platforms that focus on organization rather than extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is a member of the second category. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central workspace, provides editable policy and evidence guidelines, and allows auditors to review evidence submitted with read-only access.
It is not able to connect to operating systems or install infrastructure agents. Customers choose and upload the proof they wish to present.
Factor System Access into the Decision
It is clear that cutting off integrations will have a disadvantage. Someone must collect evidence manually.
This is a way to eliminate the need to integrate and the implementation of compliance doesn’t require a connection to the operational environment.
There is no universally superior architecture. The relevant question is which best choice is appropriate to your business.
CertAssist is a solution for teams with between five and 200 participants. Its pricing is publicized rather than having to make a sales call to get the first figure. Its advertised launch price is $225 per month, compared with a regular price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
The requirements for a start-up that has 10 employees aren’t necessarily exactly the same as a company with 100 or 500 employees.
Although compliance is easy but a lighter platform might make sense. As the number of employees, systems, frameworks and evidence demands increase, the economics could ultimately favor more automation. That’s a healthier way to acquire compliance technologies: let complexity earn its place.
Do not purchase fifty different integrations because they look impressive on the comparison chart. You should purchase them only when the cost to do the task they replace manually is greater.